On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 01:11 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Could you give the below a spin, and if it works for you, send me the
>>> above tests as a full patch so that I can post both as a seri
On 03/06/2015 01:11 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
[...]
>> Could you give the below a spin, and if it works for you, send me the
>> above tests as a full patch so that I can post both as a series?
>
> Will do as soon as I finish testing.
All passed with
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> The path parsing gets lost if the string after ':' contains '/'.
>
> Doh!
Hardly.
I only noticed because I had to implement the corresponding algorithm
for earlycon and
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:45:02AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> The path parsing gets lost if the string after ':' contains '/'.
Doh!
Thanks for reporting (and sorry for slow response).
> The selftests below fail with:
> [1.365528] ### dt-test ### FAIL of_selftest_find_node_by_name
Hi Leif,
On 11/27/2014 12:56 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Update of_find_node_by_path():
> 1) Rename function to of_find_node_opts_by_path(), adding an optional
>pointer argument. Provide a static inline wrapper version of
>of_find_node_by_path() which calls the new function with NULL as
>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:25:12PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:34:28 +
>> , Leif Lindholm
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:44:03AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > > > + separator = strchr(path, ':
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:25:12PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:34:28 +
> , Leif Lindholm
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:44:03AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > + separator = strchr(path, ':');
> > > > + if (separator && opts)
> > > > +
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:34:28 +
> , Leif Lindholm
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:44:03AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > > + separator = strchr(path, ':');
>> > > + if (separator && opts)
>> > > + *opts = separator + 1;
>>
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:34:28 +
, Leif Lindholm
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:44:03AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > + separator = strchr(path, ':');
> > > + if (separator && opts)
> > > + *opts = separator + 1;
> > > +
> >
> > What about when there are no opts? Do we require
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:44:03AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:56:06 +
> , Leif Lindholm
> wrote:
> > Update of_find_node_by_path():
> > 1) Rename function to of_find_node_opts_by_path(), adding an optional
> >pointer argument. Provide a static inline wrapper versi
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:56:06 +
, Leif Lindholm
wrote:
> Update of_find_node_by_path():
> 1) Rename function to of_find_node_opts_by_path(), adding an optional
>pointer argument. Provide a static inline wrapper version of
>of_find_node_by_path() which calls the new function with NULL a
11 matches
Mail list logo
