Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 08:17:14AM +0100, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> It seems that the other compatible strings are there for historical
> reasons. Why do you need a new one with such a specific name?
>
> It woul
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>It seems that the other compatible strings are there for historical
>>reasons. Why do you need a new one with such a specific name?
>>
>>It would have been more sensible to add a generic compatible string as
>>"allwinner,apb-gates",
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:26:05AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:11:52 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > However, I'd like to keep per-soc and per-clocks compatibles in the
> > DT, in case we need to protect a clock in the future.
>
> What do you mean by "protect a c
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:11:52PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> >>On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
> >>Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> >>
> >>> This
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:11:52 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> However, I'd like to keep per-soc and per-clocks compatibles in the
> DT, in case we need to protect a clock in the future.
What do you mean by "protect a clock"?
--
Ken ar c'hentaƱ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:11:52PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
> earlier SOCs. apb0 gat
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:56:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> >On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
> >Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> >
> >>This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
> >>earlie
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
> Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
> > earlier SOCs. apb0 gates controls R_ block peripherals (R_PIO, R_IR,
> > etc).
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
earlier SOCs. apb0 gates controls R_ block peripherals (R_PIO, R_IR,
etc).
Signed-off-by: Krz
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
> earlier SOCs. apb0 gates controls R_ block peripherals (R_PIO, R_IR,
> etc).
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clo
10 matches
Mail list logo