On 11/02/2012 02:47 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
> On 10/31/12 5:43 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 11/01/2012 02:57 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
>>> On 10/30/12 11:32 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
On 10/26/2012 08:08 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
> From: "Paton J. Lewis"
>
> It is not currently po
On 10/31/12 5:43 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
On 11/01/2012 02:57 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
On 10/30/12 11:32 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
On 10/26/2012 08:08 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
From: "Paton J. Lewis"
It is not currently possible to reliably delete epoll items when
using the
same epoll set from
On 11/01/2012 02:57 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
> On 10/30/12 11:32 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 10/26/2012 08:08 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
>>> From: "Paton J. Lewis"
>>>
>>> It is not currently possible to reliably delete epoll items when
>>> using the
>>> same epoll set from multiple threads. Aft
On 10/30/12 11:32 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
On 10/26/2012 08:08 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
From: "Paton J. Lewis"
It is not currently possible to reliably delete epoll items when using the
same epoll set from multiple threads. After calling epoll_ctl with
EPOLL_CTL_DEL, another thread might still
On 10/26/2012 08:08 AM, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
> From: "Paton J. Lewis"
>
> It is not currently possible to reliably delete epoll items when using the
> same epoll set from multiple threads. After calling epoll_ctl with
> EPOLL_CTL_DEL, another thread might still be executing code related to an
>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:08:32 -0700
"Paton J. Lewis" wrote:
> It is not currently possible to reliably delete epoll items when using the
> same epoll set from multiple threads. After calling epoll_ctl with
> EPOLL_CTL_DEL, another thread might still be executing code related to an
> event for that
6 matches
Mail list logo