Hi Randy,
On 02. 09. 19 18:52, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 AM Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>> Randy/Linus: Are you going create regular patch from this?
>
> Since I can't even test it, and Randy did most of the work (and that
> last patch worked for him too), I'd suggest he jus
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 AM Michal Simek wrote:
>
> Randy/Linus: Are you going create regular patch from this?
Since I can't even test it, and Randy did most of the work (and that
last patch worked for him too), I'd suggest he just send it in as his.
You can add my acked-by or sign-of dependi
On 9/1/19 9:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:10 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> I guess we need a way to coerce that to call get_user_1(),
>> such as a typecast. This _seems_ to work (i.e., call get_user_1()):
>
> No, I oversimplified.
>
> Try this slightly modified patch in
On 02. 09. 19 6:58, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:10 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> I guess we need a way to coerce that to call get_user_1(),
>> such as a typecast. This _seems_ to work (i.e., call get_user_1()):
>
> No, I oversimplified.
>
> Try this slightly modified patch i
From: Randy Dunlap
> Sent: 01 September 2019 15:56
> arch/microblaze/ is missing support for get_user() of size 8 bytes,
> so add it by using __copy_from_user().
Ugg
Use get_user() for 4 bytes twice and combine the returned values.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road,
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:10 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> I guess we need a way to coerce that to call get_user_1(),
> such as a typecast. This _seems_ to work (i.e., call get_user_1()):
No, I oversimplified.
Try this slightly modified patch instead.
Linus
arch/microblaze/includ
On 9/1/19 12:10 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/1/19 10:31 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 10:07 AM Linus Torvalds
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess I'll apply it. I'm not sure why you _care_ about microblaze, but ...
>
> It was just a response to the 0day build bot reporting build err
On 9/1/19 10:33 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01. 09. 19 19:07, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:55 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
>>> What is a reasonable path for having this patch merged?
>>> I have sent several emails to Micahl Simek but he seems to have
>>> dropped active
On 9/1/19 10:31 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 10:07 AM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> I guess I'll apply it. I'm not sure why you _care_ about microblaze, but ...
It was just a response to the 0day build bot reporting build errors.
> Ugh. As I was going to apply it, my code
Hi,
On 01. 09. 19 19:07, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:55 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> What is a reasonable path for having this patch merged?
>> I have sent several emails to Micahl Simek but he seems to have
>> dropped active maintenance of arch/microblaze/.
>
> Yeah, I have
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 10:07 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> I guess I'll apply it. I'm not sure why you _care_ about microblaze, but ...
Ugh. As I was going to apply it, my code cleanliness conscience struck.
I can't deal with that unnecessary duplication of code. Does something
like the attached
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:55 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> What is a reasonable path for having this patch merged?
> I have sent several emails to Micahl Simek but he seems to have
> dropped active maintenance of arch/microblaze/.
Yeah, I haven't gotten a pull request from him since March, and that
w
12 matches
Mail list logo
