Re: [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls

2016-05-22 Thread James Johnston
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:18:10AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:02:33AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > What more can I do to finally get this merged? > > > > While I am not the one to comment on kernel specifics, from a pure Samba > > user space perspecti

RE: [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls

2016-05-10 Thread Frank Filz
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:18:10AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:02:33AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > What more can I do to finally get this merged? > > > > While I am not the one to comment on kernel specifics, from a pure > > Samba user space perspectiv

Re: [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls

2016-05-10 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:11:50AM +0200, Jeremy Allison wrote: > +1 from me. This is something that many vendors need > and have needed for a very long time. Getting this > in will allow *large* amounts of existing storage to > be migrated to Linux. ZFS has NFSv4 richacls, and people seem to risk

Re: [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls

2016-05-10 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:18:10AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:02:33AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > What more can I do to finally get this merged? > > While I am not the one to comment on kernel specifics, from a pure Samba > user space perspective let me sa

Re: [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls

2016-05-09 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:02:33AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > What more can I do to finally get this merged? While I am not the one to comment on kernel specifics, from a pure Samba user space perspective let me say: We need this. NOW. Volker