Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Add NumaChip remote PCI support

2012-12-06 Thread Daniel J Blueman
On 01/12/2012 00:45, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Daniel J Blueman On 29/11/2012 07:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: Add NumaChip-specific PCI access mechanism via MMCONFIG cycles, but preventing access to AMD Northbr

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Add NumaChip remote PCI support

2012-11-30 Thread Steffen Persvold
Hi Bjorn, On 11/30/2012 17:45, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Daniel J Blueman [] We could expose pci_dev_base via struct x86_init_pci; the extra complexity and performance tradeoff may not be worth it for a single case perhaps? Oh, right, I forgot that you can't deci

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Add NumaChip remote PCI support

2012-11-30 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > > On 29/11/2012 07:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Daniel J Blueman >> wrote: >>> >>> Add NumaChip-specific PCI access mechanism via MMCONFIG cycles, but >>> preventing access to AMD Northbri

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Add NumaChip remote PCI support

2012-11-29 Thread Daniel J Blueman
Hi Bjorn, On 29/11/2012 07:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: Add NumaChip-specific PCI access mechanism via MMCONFIG cycles, but preventing access to AMD Northbridges which shouldn't respond. v2: Use PCI_DEVFN in precomputed constant limit; drop

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Add NumaChip remote PCI support

2012-11-28 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > Add NumaChip-specific PCI access mechanism via MMCONFIG cycles, but > preventing access to AMD Northbridges which shouldn't respond. > > v2: Use PCI_DEVFN in precomputed constant limit; drop unneeded includes > > Signed-off-by: Daniel J Bl