Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h

2013-11-25 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:51:00PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > I just wondered if these headers should not be split by GPIO > providers, but if you prefer it that way I'm fine with it too. We > can move stuff later if needed. > > Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot Thanks! BTW, I noticed that I missed

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h

2013-11-25 Thread Alex Courbot
On 11/25/2013 05:54 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 06:21:03PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: Now that all users of acpi_gpio.h have been moved to user either the GPIO s/user/use OK. descriptor interface or to

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h

2013-11-25 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 06:21:03PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mika Westerberg > wrote: > > Now that all users of acpi_gpio.h have been moved to user either the GPIO > > s/user/use OK. > > > descriptor interface or to the internal gpiolib.h we can get rid

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h

2013-11-23 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Now that all users of acpi_gpio.h have been moved to user either the GPIO s/user/use > descriptor interface or to the internal gpiolib.h we can get rid of gpiolib.h will also need to be renamed if you follow my suggestion below. > acpi_