>>>
> On 11/03/2015 04:47 PM, Gang He wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
>>> On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
Hello Junxiao,
See my comments inline.
>>>
> Hi Gang,
>
> This is not like a right patch.
> First, online file check only checks inode's block n
On 11/03/2015 04:47 PM, Gang He wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
>>> Hello Junxiao,
>>>
>>> See my comments inline.
>>>
>>>
>>
Hi Gang,
This is not like a right patch.
First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
f
>>>
> On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
>> Hello Junxiao,
>>
>> See my comments inline.
>>
>>
>
>>> Hi Gang,
>>>
>>> This is not like a right patch.
>>> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
>>> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real c
On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
> Hello Junxiao,
>
> See my comments inline.
>
>
>> Hi Gang,
>>
>> This is not like a right patch.
>> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
>> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption
>> happened
Hello Junxiao,
See my comments inline.
>>>
> Hi Gang,
>
> This is not like a right patch.
> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption
> happened only on this field, if these fields are corrupted, th
Hi Gang,
This is not like a right patch.
First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption
happened only on this field, if these fields are corrupted, that means
something bad may happen on other place. So fix th
6 matches
Mail list logo
