On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 00:39 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30 2015, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >> >> * Return:
> >> >> - * The amount of the characters processed to the destination buffer, or
> >> >> - * %-ENOMEM if the size of buffer is not enough to put an escaped
> >> >> chara
On Fri, Jan 30 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:29 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29 2015, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> *
>> >> * Return:
>> >> - * The amount of the characters processed to the destination buffer, or
>> >> - * %-ENOMEM if the siz
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:29 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29 2015, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>
> >> *
> >> * Return:
> >> - * The amount of the characters processed to the destination buffer, or
> >> - * %-ENOMEM if the size of buffer is not enough to put an escaped
> >> chara
On Thu, Jan 29 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> *
>> * Return:
>> - * The amount of the characters processed to the destination buffer, or
>> - * %-ENOMEM if the size of buffer is not enough to put an escaped character
>> is
>> - * returned.
>> - *
>> - * Even in the case of error @dst pointe
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 11:03 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
Thanks for an update.
Few comments below.
> The current semantics of string_escape_mem are inadequate for one of
> its two current users, vsnprintf(). If that is to honour its contract,
> it must know how much space would be needed for th
5 matches
Mail list logo