On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 01:35:13PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jason Cooper writes:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:47:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >>
> >> I have no new call sites in mind, but it seems safe to add a BUG_ON to
> >>
Jason Cooper writes:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:47:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>
>> I have no new call sites in mind, but it seems safe to add a BUG_ON to
>> verify we don't gain callers that don't follow the correct
>> expectations. (O
Hi Kees,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:47:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 09:46:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >> > To date, all callers of randomize_range() hav
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 09:46:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> > To date, all callers of randomize_range() have set the length to 0, and
>> > check for a zero return value. For the curre
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 09:46:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > To date, all callers of randomize_range() have set the length to 0, and
> > check for a zero return value. For the current callers, the only way
> > to get zero returned is if end
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> To date, all callers of randomize_range() have set the length to 0, and
> check for a zero return value. For the current callers, the only way
> to get zero returned is if end <= start. Since they are all adding a
> constant to the start add
6 matches
Mail list logo
