Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF

2016-04-06 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Hi Kishon, Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2016, 22:29:01 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > The displayport-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF). > Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate > platform- device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the > simply-mfd

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF

2016-03-28 Thread Yakir Yang
Hi Heiko, On 03/25/2016 05:29 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: The displayport-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF). Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate platform- device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the simply-mfd mechanism. The driver

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF

2016-03-25 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:29:01PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > The displayport-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF). > Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate platform- > device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the simply-mfd mechanism. >