Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 01:42:15PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Vlastimil, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 17:01, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > On 2/3/25 12:13, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by > > > adjusting the maintainer role for a

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

Hi Vlastimil, On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 17:01, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 2/3/25 12:13, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by > > adjusting the maintainer role for any status different from Maintained. > > This has two downsides: > > > > - if a

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

On 2/11/25 17:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Vlastimil, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 17:09, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 2/11/25 16:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 15:58, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> >> On 2/11/25 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> I've tried to do t

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

Hi Vlastimil, On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 17:09, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 2/11/25 16:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 15:58, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 2/11/25 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> I've tried to do that in v1 in the form of reporting e.g. as > >> John D

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

On 2/11/25 16:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Vlastimil, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 15:58, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 2/11/25 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> I've tried to do that in v1 in the form of reporting e.g. as >> John Doe (maintainer:SUBSYSTEM [supported]) >> >> But it seemed n

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

On 2/3/25 12:13, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by > adjusting the maintainer role for any status different from Maintained. > This has two downsides: > > - if a subsystem has only reviewers or mailing lists and no maintainers, > the status

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

Hi Uwe, On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 16:09, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:48:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 11:32, Uwe Kleine-König > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > > The subsystem status is

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

On 2/11/25 11:59, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 2/11/25 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Hi Uwe, >> >> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 11:32, Uwe Kleine-König >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats)

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

Hi Vlastimil, On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 15:58, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 2/11/25 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 11:32, Uwe Kleine-König > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> > The subsystem status is currently reported w

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

Hello Geert, On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:48:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 11:32, Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by > > > adjusting th

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

On 2/11/25 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 11:32, Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by >> > adjusting the maintainer role for any st

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

Hi Uwe, On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 11:32, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by > > adjusting the maintainer role for any status different from Maintained. > > This has two downsi

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

Hello, On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by > adjusting the maintainer role for any status different from Maintained. > This has two downsides: > > - if a subsystem has only reviewers or mailing lists a

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add --substatus for reporting subsystem status

On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:13:16PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by > adjusting the maintainer role for any status different from Maintained. > This has two downsides: > > - if a subsystem has only reviewers or mailing lists and no mai