Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: dt-bindings: Explain order in patch series

2014-10-20 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Jon, On 10/20/2014 05:49 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100 > Mark Rutland wrote: > >> Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so: >> >> Acked-by: Mark Rutland > > Applied to my shiny new docs tree in case nobody else grabs it. > > jon

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: dt-bindings: Explain order in patch series

2014-10-20 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100 Mark Rutland wrote: > Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland Applied to my shiny new docs tree in case nobody else grabs it. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: dt-bindings: Explain order in patch series

2014-10-14 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > When posting a patch series that includes both code implementing a > Device Tree binding and its associated documentation, the DT docs > should come in the series before the implementation. > > This not only avoids checkpa