Apologies for that. I've addressed in v3 but only tested for riscv.
There is potential for additional tidy up related to this change, let
me know what would be appropriate.
Thanks,
Ian
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:42 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:23:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:23:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/lzma.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/demangle-java.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/demangle-rust.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/jitdump.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util
Em Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:43:41PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Being const + weak breaks with some compilers that constant-propagate
> > from the weak symbol. This behavior is outside of the specification, but
> > in LLVM is chosen to
Em Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:43:41PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Being const + weak breaks with some compilers that constant-propagate
> > from the weak symbol. This behavior is outside of the specification, but
> > in LLVM is chosen to
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:43:41PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Being const + weak breaks with some compilers that constant-propagate
> from the weak symbol. This behavior is outside of the specification, but
> in LLVM is chosen to match GCC's behavior.
>
> LLVM's implementation was set in this patc
5 matches
Mail list logo
