On Wed 20-04-16 19:17:13, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 11:14 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch
> > > > set?
> > > I'm not sir, but my preference would be to mov
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 11:14 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote:
> [..]
> > > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch
> > > set?
> > I'm not sir, but my preference would be to move as much of the
> > async/thread functionality as possib
On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote:
[..]
> > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch set?
>
> I'm not sir, but my preference would be to move as much of the
> async/thread functionality as possible into a separate file.
hm, we are talking about some 50-60 lines of cod
On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 11:55 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/08/16 02:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch set makes printk() completely asynchronous: new messages
> > are getting upended to the kernel printk buffer, but instead of 'direct'
> > printing the ac
On (04/08/16 02:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch set makes printk() completely asynchronous: new messages
> are getting upended to the kernel printk buffer, but instead of 'direct'
> printing the actual print job is performed by a dedicated kthread.
> This has the advantage t
5 matches
Mail list logo