Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] printk: Make printk() completely async

2016-04-21 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 20-04-16 19:17:13, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 11:14 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote: > > [..] > > > > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch > > > > set? > > > I'm not sir, but my preference would be to mov

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] printk: Make printk() completely async

2016-04-20 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 11:14 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote: > [..] > > > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch > > > set? > > I'm not sir, but my preference would be to move as much of the > > async/thread functionality as possib

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] printk: Make printk() completely async

2016-04-20 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote: [..] > > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch set? > > I'm not sir, but my preference would be to move as much of the > async/thread functionality as possible into a separate file. hm, we are talking about some 50-60 lines of cod

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] printk: Make printk() completely async

2016-04-15 Thread Joe Perches
On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 11:55 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (04/08/16 02:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > This patch set makes printk() completely asynchronous: new messages > > are getting upended to the kernel printk buffer, but instead of 'direct' > > printing the ac

Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] printk: Make printk() completely async

2016-04-15 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (04/08/16 02:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > > This patch set makes printk() completely asynchronous: new messages > are getting upended to the kernel printk buffer, but instead of 'direct' > printing the actual print job is performed by a dedicated kthread. > This has the advantage t