Eddie,
> Thanks for the details. I have sent up a new series which will only do the
> bus reset if SDA is low. With our current hardware configuration, this
Thanks.
> *should* be sufficient to recover all the possible errors. However, there
> are configurations where it will not be enough, in wh
On 07/02/2018 01:15 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi Eddie,
I think this is a way too aggressive recovery. Your are doing the 9
pulse toggles basically on any error while this is only when the device
keeps SDA low and you want to recover from that. If SDA is not stuck
low, sending a STOP should do
Hi Eddie,
> > I think this is a way too aggressive recovery. Your are doing the 9
> > pulse toggles basically on any error while this is only when the device
> > keeps SDA low and you want to recover from that. If SDA is not stuck
> > low, sending a STOP should do. Or do you have a known case wher
On 06/25/2018 09:38 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 02:36:16PM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
Add abort procedure for failed transfers. Add engine and bus reset
procedures to recover from as many faults as possible.
I think this is a way too aggressive recovery. Your are doing the
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 02:36:16PM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
> Add abort procedure for failed transfers. Add engine and bus reset
> procedures to recover from as many faults as possible.
I think this is a way too aggressive recovery. Your are doing the 9
pulse toggles basically on any error while
5 matches
Mail list logo
