On 2017-06-09 10:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 07:12 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>>> @@ -984,12 +984,12 @@ int i2c_dw_probe(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> i2c_dw_disable_int(dev);
>>> - r = devm_request_irq(dev->dev,
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 07:12 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> > complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work
> > to
> > backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
>
> I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed bef
On 09-Jun-17 6:12, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>> complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work to
>> backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
>
> I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed before this patch
> that
On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work to
> backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed before this patch
that is fixed in the future after this patch has been
4 matches
Mail list logo
