On 4/29/25 17:15, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 04:14:13PM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>> On 4/29/25 14:49, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> I'm not sure it's best to overload this data in this way. I think mixing
> a
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 04:14:13PM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> On 4/29/25 14:49, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> >>> I'm not sure it's best to overload this data in this way. I think mixing
> >>> actual files and "logical" modules in the mo
On 4/29/25 14:49, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
>>> I'm not sure it's best to overload this data in this way. I think mixing
>>> actual files and "logical" modules in the modules list is somewhat
>>> confusing.
>>>
>>> An alternative would b
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> > I'm not sure it's best to overload this data in this way. I think mixing
> > actual files and "logical" modules in the modules list is somewhat
> > confusing.
> >
> > An alternative would be to keep a single module struct for vmli
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:25:47AM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> On 4/26/25 18:16, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> > For some modules, modalias is generated using the modpost utility and
> > the section is added to the module file.
> >
> > When a module is added inside vmlinux, modpost does not generate
> >
On 4/26/25 18:16, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> For some modules, modalias is generated using the modpost utility and
> the section is added to the module file.
>
> When a module is added inside vmlinux, modpost does not generate
> modalias for such modules and the information is lost.
>
> As a result
6 matches
Mail list logo
