On 05/07/2015 03:55 PM, Nicolae Rosia wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>> Okay, please inform about your results. I think I had that one and the
>> result was no UART communication at all and a lot overrun errors.
>
> I have reverted this patch and the serial comm is working well.
> I haven't been able to test
Hi,
>
> Okay, please inform about your results. I think I had that one and the
> result was no UART communication at all and a lot overrun errors.
I have reverted this patch and the serial comm is working well.
I haven't been able to test with the SDMA firmware, yet.
Thank you for the bug report a
On 05/06/2015 06:46 PM, Nicolae Rosia wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>> I reverted this patch. I am going to send a revert to Greg tomorrow
>> including why this is done and CC stable. I haven't yet received a
>> working SDMA firmware nor a hint where it is.
> You reverted this patch and it works again?
> I be
Hi,
> I reverted this patch. I am going to send a revert to Greg tomorrow
> including why this is done and CC stable. I haven't yet received a
> working SDMA firmware nor a hint where it is.
You reverted this patch and it works again?
I believe it is this one [1], but I will be only able to test t
On 05/06/2015 06:08 PM, Nicolae Rosia wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe I'm also affected by this BUG. I'm receiving lots of 0 and 1
> (ASCII, as presented by cat /dev/ttymxcX) and RX buffer is
> overflowing.
>
>> the firmware only supports imx6 series, AFAIK,
>> I checked with Freescale imx6 support team,
Hi,
I believe I'm also affected by this BUG. I'm receiving lots of 0 and 1
(ASCII, as presented by cat /dev/ttymxcX) and RX buffer is
overflowing.
> the firmware only supports imx6 series, AFAIK,
> I checked with Freescale imx6 support team, due to
> licensing issue, I am not entitled to upstream
On 04/17/2015 11:18 AM, jiwang wrote:
> Hello Sebastian
Hallo Jiada,
>> Please make sure it is tagged stable. There is no hint that this is
>> required
>> and as of it now, it breaks v4.0.
> Due to missing of SDMA firmware, uart sdma mode is broken,
> but it is uncovered by this commit on your en
Hello Sebastian
On 04/13/2015 05:06 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +0900, jiwang wrote:
Hi Sebastian
Hi Jiada,
My question is how was this tested. Before your patch none of my boards
were using DMA because RTS/CTS is not in use and this was a key
requ
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +0900, jiwang wrote:
> Hi Sebastian
Hi Jiada,
> >My question is how was this tested. Before your patch none of my boards
> >were using DMA because RTS/CTS is not in use and this was a key
> >requirement. Now SDMA goes crazy. Is there a SDMA firmware required for
Hi Sebastian
On 04/09/2015 09:00 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2014-12-09 18:11:32 [+0900], Jiada Wang wrote:
From: Anton Bondarenko
DMA mode for UART can be used even w/o HW flow control with RTS/CTS.
So it need to be initialized and enabled earlier.
Signed-off-by: Anton Bondarenk
On 2014-12-09 18:11:32 [+0900], Jiada Wang wrote:
> From: Anton Bondarenko
>
> DMA mode for UART can be used even w/o HW flow control with RTS/CTS.
> So it need to be initialized and enabled earlier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Bondarenko
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang
How was this tested? I read y
11 matches
Mail list logo
