> > After brief evaluation it still doesn't look easy. The simplest thing
> > I could imagine is to probably combine file_path and file_offset at a
> > struct object on stack and then pass the object by the reference along
> > function calls. I expect it will roughly cause the same amount of change
On 20.10.2020 19:31, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> On 12.10.2020 20:06, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>
>> On 12.10.2020 19:01, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:54:24AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
@@ -180,7 +183,8 @@ static int ordered_events__deliver_event(struct
ordered_eve
On 12.10.2020 20:06, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> On 12.10.2020 19:01, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:54:24AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>> @@ -180,7 +183,8 @@ static int ordered_events__deliver_event(struct
>>> ordered_events *oe,
>>>
Hi,
On 13.10.2020 22:54, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:54:24AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>
>> Output path of a trace file into raw dump (-D) @.
>> Print offset of PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED record instead of zero for
>> decompressed records:
>> 0x22...@perf.data [0x30]: event: 9
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:54:24AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> Output path of a trace file into raw dump (-D) @.
> Print offset of PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED record instead of zero for
> decompressed records:
> 0x22...@perf.data [0x30]: event: 9
> or
> 0x15c...@perf.data/data.7 [0x30]: event
On 12.10.2020 19:01, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:54:24AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>> @@ -180,7 +183,8 @@ static int ordered_events__deliver_event(struct
>> ordered_events *oe,
>> ordered_events);
>>
>> return perf_se
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:54:24AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> @@ -180,7 +183,8 @@ static int ordered_events__deliver_event(struct
> ordered_events *oe,
> ordered_events);
>
> return perf_session__deliver_event(session, event->event,
>
7 matches
Mail list logo