On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 10:31 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> Have you encountered any issue with another call site of
> setup_irq() in arch/x86/kernel/time.c?
No, since Intel MID uses its own .timer_init callback.
> void __init setup_default_timer_irq(void)
> {
>
Hi Andy,
Have you encountered any issue with another call site of
setup_irq() in arch/x86/kernel/time.c?
void __init setup_default_timer_irq(void)
{
setup_irq(0, &irq0);
}
Seems it may need the same protection for system without
legacy IRQ con
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:34 AM, David Cohen
wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:59:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> The patch "x86, irq: Count legacy IRQs by legacy_pic->nr_legacy_irqs instead
>> of
>> NR_IRQS_LEGACY" (linux-next commit 95d76acc7518d5
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:59:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The patch "x86, irq: Count legacy IRQs by legacy_pic->nr_legacy_irqs instead
> of
> NR_IRQS_LEGACY" (linux-next commit 95d76acc7518d566df18d67c1343bb375b78d1f3)
> removed reserved interrupts for the
4 matches
Mail list logo