Re: [PATCH review 5/6] userns: Allow the userns root to mount ramfs.

2013-01-27 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com): > "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > > > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com): > >> > >> There is no backing store to ramfs and file creation > >> rules are the same as for any other filesystem so > >> it is semantically safe to allow unpr

Re: [PATCH review 5/6] userns: Allow the userns root to mount ramfs.

2013-01-27 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com): > > There is no backing store to ramfs and file creation > rules are the same as for any other filesystem so > it is semantically safe to allow unprivileged users > to mount it. > > The memory control group successfully limits how much > memory r

Re: [PATCH review 5/6] userns: Allow the userns root to mount ramfs.

2013-01-26 Thread Eric W. Biederman
"Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com): >> >> There is no backing store to ramfs and file creation >> rules are the same as for any other filesystem so >> it is semantically safe to allow unprivileged users >> to mount it. >> >> The memory control group su

Re: [PATCH review 5/6] userns: Allow the userns root to mount ramfs.

2013-01-26 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com): > > There is no backing store to ramfs and file creation > rules are the same as for any other filesystem so > it is semantically safe to allow unprivileged users > to mount it. > > The memory control group successfully limits how much > memory r