On Tue 2021-02-02 12:47:20, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2021-02-02, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Tue 2021-01-26 22:21:50, John Ogness wrote:
> >> Since the ringbuffer is lockless, there is no need for it to be
> >> protected by @logbuf_lock. Remove @logbuf_lock.
> >>
> >> This means that printk_nmi_dire
On 2021-02-02, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2021-01-26 22:21:50, John Ogness wrote:
>> Since the ringbuffer is lockless, there is no need for it to be
>> protected by @logbuf_lock. Remove @logbuf_lock.
>>
>> This means that printk_nmi_direct and printk_safe_flush_on_panic()
>> no longer need to ac
On Tue 2021-01-26 22:21:50, John Ogness wrote:
> Since the ringbuffer is lockless, there is no need for it to be
> protected by @logbuf_lock. Remove @logbuf_lock.
>
> This means that printk_nmi_direct and printk_safe_flush_on_panic()
> no longer need to acquire any lock to run.
>
> @console_seq,
3 matches
Mail list logo
