Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Time Counter fixes and improvements

2015-01-02 Thread Richard Cochran
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:37:09AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > Though, this does start to sound like issues the timekeeping code had > to resolve, so while its probably time to let some flowers bloom and > see what happens, we should be somewhat watchful for too much logic > duplication. You took

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Time Counter fixes and improvements

2015-01-02 Thread John Stultz
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Richard Cochran wrote: > Several PTP Hardware Clock (PHC) drivers implement the clock in > software using the timecounter/cyclecounter code. This series adds one > simple improvement and one more subtle fix to the shared timecounter > facility. Credit for this ser

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Time Counter fixes and improvements

2014-12-31 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 06:32:01PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > Series applied, thanks Richard. I got an automated email from kbuild test robot showing new warnings and errors introduced by this series. I'll follow up with fixes soon. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Time Counter fixes and improvements

2014-12-30 Thread David Miller
From: Richard Cochran Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:46:55 +0100 > Several PTP Hardware Clock (PHC) drivers implement the clock in > software using the timecounter/cyclecounter code. This series adds one > simple improvement and one more subtle fix to the shared timecounter > facility. Credit for this