On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 21:53 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 21:44 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>
>> > I think ifdef config_x86 is a bit ugly inside struct sk_filter, but
>> > don't mind whichever way.
>>
>> Its not fair
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 21:53 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 21:44 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > I think ifdef config_x86 is a bit ugly inside struct sk_filter, but
> > don't mind whichever way.
>
> Its not fair to make sk_filter bigger, because it means that simple (no
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 21:44 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> I think ifdef config_x86 is a bit ugly inside struct sk_filter, but
> don't mind whichever way.
Its not fair to make sk_filter bigger, because it means that simple (non
JIT) filter might need an extra cache line.
You could presumably
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 20:50 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> on x86 system with net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
>> index a6ac848..378fa03 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
>>
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 20:50 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> on x86 system with net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index a6ac848..378fa03 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct sk_f
5 matches
Mail list logo
