On 10-04-18, 15:40, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Can you please describe how this bootconstraints core integration is
> simpler than a "run things at max performance until late kernel init",
> which could be triggered by a simple initcall similar to what is done
> for clocks and regulators?
>
> To me the
Hi Georgi,
Am Freitag, den 30.03.2018, 18:24 +0300 schrieb Georgi Djakov:
[...]
> The interconnect core takes requests from consumer drivers for their
> bandwidth needs and configures the hardware to keep the lowest possible
> power profile. I think that the boot constraint patches would be useful
Hi Greg and Viresh,
On 03/23/2018 05:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:26:06AM +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 23-02-18, 15:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Problem statement:
>>>
>>> Some devices are powered ON by the bootloader before the bootloader
>>> handovers control
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:26:06AM +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-02-18, 15:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Problem statement:
> >
> > Some devices are powered ON by the bootloader before the bootloader
> > handovers control to Linux. It maybe important for some of those devices
> > to keep workin
On 23-02-18, 15:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Problem statement:
>
> Some devices are powered ON by the bootloader before the bootloader
> handovers control to Linux. It maybe important for some of those devices
> to keep working until the time a Linux device driver probes the device
> and reconfigure
On 23-02-18, 15:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> The V7 version incorporates the organizational changes suggested by Olof
> earlier. Everything else is same otherwise.
>
> I have tested the Hisilicon patches (again) on hikey 9660 board, IMX stuff was
> earlier tested by Sascha (Pengutronix)
6 matches
Mail list logo
