Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support

2014-03-03 Thread David E. Box
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 06:15:15AM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > On 2014/3/3 23:58, David E. Box wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > >> Hi David, > >> > >> I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's > >> the relationship between > >>a

Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support

2014-03-03 Thread Li, Aubrey
On 2014/3/3 23:58, David E. Box wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's >> the relationship between >> arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c >> and >> drivers/platform/x86/intel_bayt

Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support

2014-03-03 Thread David E. Box
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:01:45PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's > the relationship between > arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c > and > drivers/platform/x86/intel_baytrail.c > iosf_mbi.c is the version that went

Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] x86: IOSF: Add loadable module support

2014-03-02 Thread Li, Aubrey
Hi David, I'm probably too late to catch this thread. Just one question, what's the relationship between arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c and drivers/platform/x86/intel_baytrail.c Thanks, -Aubrey On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote: > From: "David E. Box" > > This patch series adds