On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Bresticker
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> The patch adds a mismatch between the Kconfig symbol (a bool) and the
>> code (which suggests that a modular build is also possible).
>
> Nearly all of the pinctrl driver
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 11:37 -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> I have no immediate plans to make this a module, but since the changes
> to make it buildable as a module have no overhead (at least I think
> they don't!) I'd prefer to leave them in for consistency and to
> eliminate any ne
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 09:56 -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> > The patch adds a mismatch between the Kconfig symbol (a bool) and the
>> > code (which suggests tha
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 09:56 -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > The patch adds a mismatch between the Kconfig symbol (a bool) and the
> > code (which suggests that a modular build is also possible).
>
> Nearly all of the pinctrl dri
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> The patch adds a mismatch between the Kconfig symbol (a bool) and the
> code (which suggests that a modular build is also possible).
Nearly all of the pinctrl drivers (with the exception of qcom and
intel) are like this. They use a b
The patch adds a mismatch between the Kconfig symbol (a bool) and the
code (which suggests that a modular build is also possible).
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:16 -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
> +config PINCTRL_PISTACHIO
> + def_bo
6 matches
Mail list logo
