Re: [PATCH V2 06/14] irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ

On 22/04/16 09:48, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 22/04/16 09:22, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> On 21/04/16 16:45, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> >>> On 20/04/16 12:03, Jon Hunter wrote: Some IRQ chips, such as GPIO controllers or secondary level interrupt controllers, may require require additi

Re: [PATCH V2 06/14] irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ

On 22/04/16 09:22, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 21/04/16 16:45, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 20/04/16 12:03, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Some IRQ chips, such as GPIO controllers or secondary level interrupt >>> controllers, may require require additional runtime power management >>> control to en

Re: [PATCH V2 06/14] irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ

Hi Jon, On 21/04/16 16:45, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 20/04/16 12:03, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Some IRQ chips, such as GPIO controllers or secondary level interrupt >> controllers, may require require additional runtime power management >> control to ensure they are accessible. For such IRQ chips, it m

Re: [PATCH V2 06/14] irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ

On 20/04/16 12:03, Jon Hunter wrote: > Some IRQ chips, such as GPIO controllers or secondary level interrupt > controllers, may require require additional runtime power management > control to ensure they are accessible. For such IRQ chips, it makes sense > to enable the IRQ chip when interrupts a