Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-05-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> 2018-04-27 12:18 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski >>> wrote: 2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Apr

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-04-27 16:48 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski > > So speaking in pseudo-C we basically have two ways for an imaginary > future timer driver: > > int foo_probe(struct platform_device *

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 16:48 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski > wrote: >> 2018-04-27 14:40 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > >>> For timer-ti-dm, it seems like a leftover from old times that can >>> be removed. The other four are shared between arch/sh and >>> arch/ar

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Rich Felker
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > 2018-04-27 12:18 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski > >> wrote: > >>> 2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 14:40 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> 2018-04-27 12:18 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski >>> wrote: 2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-04-27 14:40 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >> For timer-ti-dm, it seems like a leftover from old times that can >> be removed. The other four are shared between arch/sh and >> arch/arm/mach-shmobile and already have some #ifdef >> to h

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-04-27 12:18 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski >> wrote: >>> 2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: >>> My patch

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 12:18 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski > wrote: >> 2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >> >> We have platforms out there whic

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: >>> On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > > We have platforms out there which still use both board files and > device tree. They

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 10:55 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Friday 27 April 2018 01:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >>> >>> I haven't seen the discus

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: >> On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:29:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: From: Bartosz Golaszewski This is a follow to my series[

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Friday 27 April 2018 01:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: >>> On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >> >> I haven't seen the discussion about your clock drivers, but I know that >> u

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Sekhar Nori
Hi Arnd, On Friday 27 April 2018 01:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: >> On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:29:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: From: Bartosz Golaszewski This is

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner wrote: > On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:29:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>> >>> This is a follow to my series[1] the aim of which was to introduce device >>> tre

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-26 Thread Rich Felker
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:28:39PM -0500, David Lechner wrote: > On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:29:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >>From: Bartosz Golaszewski > >> > >>This is a follow to my series[1] the aim of which was to introduce device > >>

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-26 Thread David Lechner
On 04/26/2018 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:29:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: From: Bartosz Golaszewski This is a follow to my series[1] the aim of which was to introduce device tree support for early platform devices. It was received rather negatively. Aside

Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers

2018-04-26 Thread Rich Felker
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:29:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > This is a follow to my series[1] the aim of which was to introduce device tree > support for early platform devices. > > It was received rather negatively. Aside from using device tree to pass >