Re: [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: flag split arithmetic operations with CHECK

2015-05-05 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 16:08 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > On Tue, 05 May 2015, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:53:36AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > > > Simple arithmetic operations should be on one line, if they can be f

Re: [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: flag split arithmetic operations with CHECK

2015-05-05 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 16:08 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > On Tue, 05 May 2015, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:53:36AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > > Simple arithmetic operations should be on one line, if they can be fit, > > > rather than splitting at the operator.

Re: [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: flag split arithmetic operations with CHECK

2015-05-05 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:53:36AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > Simple arithmetic operations should be on one line, if they can be fit, > > rather than splitting at the operator. As this is not in the CodingStyle it > > is limited to --strict us

Re: [PATCH RFC] checkpatch: flag split arithmetic operations with CHECK

2015-05-05 Thread Andy Whitcroft
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:53:36AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > Simple arithmetic operations should be on one line, if they can be fit, > rather than splitting at the operator. As this is not in the CodingStyle it > is limited to --strict use of checkpatch.pl and emits a CHECK only. > > Sign