On Thu, 15 May 2014, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to
> > > "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler may cr
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to
> > "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler may create confusion
> > with the notion of energy consumpt
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to
> "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler may create confusion
> with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally.
>
> This cont
3 matches
Mail list logo