Re: [PATCH 6/6] containers: BeanCounters over generic process containers

2006-12-25 Thread Paul Menage
On 12/25/06, Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also note that certain limits are much more > complicated than the (very simple) file limits > and the code will be called at higher frequency Agree with this. This patch doesn't prove that BCs can be integrated to the containers infrastru

Re: [PATCH 6/6] containers: BeanCounters over generic process containers

2006-12-25 Thread Pavel Emelianov
Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:14:48AM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: >> This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction >> over generic process containers. It contains the beancounter core >> code, plus the numfiles resource counter. It doesn't currently contain >

Re: [PATCH 6/6] containers: BeanCounters over generic process containers

2006-12-25 Thread Kirill Korotaev
Herbert, >>This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction >>over generic process containers. It contains the beancounter core >>code, plus the numfiles resource counter. It doesn't currently contain >>any of the memory tracking code or the code for switching beancounter >>conte

Re: [PATCH 6/6] containers: BeanCounters over generic process containers

2006-12-24 Thread Paul Menage
On 12/23/06, Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:14:48AM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction > over generic process containers. It contains the beancounter core > code, plus the numfiles resource counter.

Re: [PATCH 6/6] containers: BeanCounters over generic process containers

2006-12-23 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:14:48AM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction > over generic process containers. It contains the beancounter core > code, plus the numfiles resource counter. It doesn't currently contain > any of the memory tracking