Built and booted on my x86_64 test system. No dmesg regressions.
Thank you
Bharath
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:18:54AM -0600, Kelsey Skunberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:14:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> > There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:14:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
On 25/07/19 22:57, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 03:19:33PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
>> I would still prefer to run the latest tests against all kernel versions
>> (but better control when we upgrade it). Like I said, we can handle
>> expected failures, and it would even help to
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 03:19:33PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> I would still prefer to run the latest tests against all kernel versions
> (but better control when we upgrade it). Like I said, we can handle
> expected failures, and it would even help to validate backports for
> fixes that do get backpor
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 07:06:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/07/19 18:39, Dan Rue wrote:
> > To your point Paolo - reporting 'fail' because of a missing kernel
> > feature is a generic problem we see across test suites, and causes tons
> > of pain and misery for CI people. As a general ru
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:04:43AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 24/07/2019 20:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> > There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issu
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:35:09AM -0600, shuah wrote:
> On 7/24/19 1:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> > There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with t
On 25/07/19 18:39, Dan Rue wrote:
> To your point Paolo - reporting 'fail' because of a missing kernel
> feature is a generic problem we see across test suites, and causes tons
> of pain and misery for CI people. As a general rule, I'd avoid
> submodules, and even branches that track specific kerne
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:14:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:30:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/07/19 18:20, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:10:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 25/07/19 18:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This investigation confirms it is a new test code failure on st
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:30:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/07/19 18:20, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:10:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 25/07/19 18:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This investigation confirms it is a new test code failure on st
On 25/07/19 18:20, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:10:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 25/07/19 18:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
This investigation confirms it is a new test code failure on stable-rc
5.2.3
>>> No, it only confirms that kvm-unit-tests/master
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:10:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/07/19 18:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >> This investigation confirms it is a new test code failure on stable-rc
> >> 5.2.3
> > No, it only confirms that kvm-unit-tests/master fails on 5.2.*. To confirm
> > a new failure in
On 25/07/19 18:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> This investigation confirms it is a new test code failure on stable-rc 5.2.3
> No, it only confirms that kvm-unit-tests/master fails on 5.2.*. To confirm
> a new failure in 5.2.3 you would need to show a test that passes on 5.2.2
> and fails on 5.2.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 07:35:13PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Paolo,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 19:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > On 25/07/19 13:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Any chance you can run 'git bisect' to find the offending patch? Or
> > > just try reverting a few, you can i
On 7/24/19 1:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made b
Paolo,
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 19:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 25/07/19 13:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Any chance you can run 'git bisect' to find the offending patch? Or
> > just try reverting a few, you can ignore the ppc ones, so that only
> > leaves you 7 different commits.
> >
> > D
On 25/07/19 13:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Any chance you can run 'git bisect' to find the offending patch? Or
> just try reverting a few, you can ignore the ppc ones, so that only
> leaves you 7 different commits.
>
> Does this same test pass in 5.3-rc1?
Anders, are you running the same kvm
> > Regressions (compared to build v5.2.2)
> >
> >
> > x86:
> > kvm-unit-tests:
> > * vmx
> >
> >
> > TESTNAME=vmx TIMEOUT=90s ACCEL= ./x86/run x86/vmx.flat -smp 1 -cpu
> > host,+vmx -append \"-exit_monitor_from_l2_test
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:16:19PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 21:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> > There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If any
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 21:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Resp
On 24/07/2019 20:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.3 release.
> There are 413 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses sho
stable-rc/linux-5.2.y boot: 139 boots: 1 failed, 136 passed with 1 offline, 1
untried/unknown (v5.2.2-414-ga4059e390eb8)
Full Boot Summary:
https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.2.y/kernel/v5.2.2-414-ga4059e390eb8/
Full Build Summary:
https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/br
24 matches
Mail list logo
