Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

2012/8/14 Tejun Heo : > Hello, > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote: >> 2012/8/14 Tejun Heo : >> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >> > Is this from an actual workload? ie. do you have a test case where >> > this matters? >> >> No. it is not

Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

Hello, On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote: > 2012/8/14 Tejun Heo : > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > Is this from an actual workload? ie. do you have a test case where > > this matters? > > No. it is not from an actual workload. > I got

Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

2012/8/14 Tejun Heo : > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >> To speed cpu down processing up, use system_highpri_wq. >> As scheduling priority of workers on it is higher than system_wq and >> it is not contended by other normal works on this cpu, work on it >> is processe

Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > To speed cpu down processing up, use system_highpri_wq. > As scheduling priority of workers on it is higher than system_wq and > it is not contended by other normal works on this cpu, work on it > is processed faster than system_wq. Is