Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/200] 3.2.56-rc1 review

2014-04-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 22:36 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Sun, 30 Mar 2014 17:49:46 -0700, > Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.56 release. > > > There are 200 patches in th

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/200] 3.2.56-rc1 review

2014-04-01 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Sun, 30 Mar 2014 17:49:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.56 release. > > There are 200 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyo

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/200] 3.2.56-rc1 review

2014-03-31 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/30/2014 06:04 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 17:49 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.56 release. There are 200 patches in this series, which will be posted as

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/200] 3.2.56-rc1 review

2014-03-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 17:49 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.56 release. > > There are 200 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone h

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/200] 3.2.56-rc1 review

2014-03-30 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.56 release. > There are 200 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. >