On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Ryan Mallon wrote:
On 18/09/12 15:40, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 07:21 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
Actually, I wonder if it is useful to have something like:.
Read and write differ only in the flag also it will be a deviation from
what $SUBJECT
would warr
On 18/09/12 15:40, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2012 07:21 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> Actually, I wonder if it is useful to have something like:.
> Read and write differ only in the flag also it will be a deviation from
> what $SUBJECT
> would warrant. So could be a separate patch.
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 07:21 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> Actually, I wonder if it is useful to have something like:.
Read and write differ only in the flag also it will be a deviation from
what $SUBJECT
would warrant. So could be a separate patch.
>
> #define I2C_WRITE(_addr, _buf, _len)
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 07:15 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> ,
> Putting the whole initialiser on one line is a bit ugly. Any reason not
> to expand it over multiple lines as the previous patch (and majority of
> other drivers) does?
Will do that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
On 17/09/12 23:58, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> Convert the struct i2c_msg initialization to C99 format. This makes
> maintaining and editing the code simpler. Also helps once other fields
> like transferred are added in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-is
On 17/09/12 23:58, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> Convert the struct i2c_msg initialization to C99 format. This makes
> maintaining and editing the code simpler. Also helps once other fields
> like transferred are added in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-is
6 matches
Mail list logo
