On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:20 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 05/28/2015 03:35 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> > Add a new PMEM API to x86, and allow for architectures that do not
>> > implement this API. Architectures that implement the PMEM API
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 21:19 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 05:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, yes, but I believe Ross (on vacation now) was following the
> > precedent set by commit cd8ddf1a2800 "x86: clflush_page_range needs
> > mfence" whereby the api handles all necessary
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:20 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 03:35 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Add a new PMEM API to x86, and allow for architectures that do not
> > implement this API. Architectures that implement the PMEM API
> > should
> > define ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API in their kernel c
On 05/28/2015 05:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Hmm, yes, but I believe Ross (on vacation now) was following the
> precedent set by commit cd8ddf1a2800 "x86: clflush_page_range needs
> mfence" whereby the api handles all necessary fencing internally.
> Shall we introduce something like __unordered
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:20 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 03:35 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> Add a new PMEM API to x86, and allow for architectures that do not
>> implement this API. Architectures that implement the PMEM API should
>> define ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API in their kernel configurat
On 05/28/2015 03:35 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Add a new PMEM API to x86, and allow for architectures that do not
> implement this API. Architectures that implement the PMEM API should
> define ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API in their kernel configuration and must provide
> implementations for persistent_copy(),
6 matches
Mail list logo
