On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:38:20 +0100
Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:11:22AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > On 10/31/2016 01:36 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > Only s390 and powerpc have hardware facilities allowing to measure
> > > cputimes scaled by frequency. On
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:11:22AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 01:36 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Only s390 and powerpc have hardware facilities allowing to measure
> > cputimes scaled by frequency. On all other architectures
> > utimescaled/stimescaled are equal to utim
On 10/31/2016 01:36 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Only s390 and powerpc have hardware facilities allowing to measure
> cputimes scaled by frequency. On all other architectures
> utimescaled/stimescaled are equal to utime/stime (however they are
> accounted separately).
>
> Patch remove {u,s}times
Hi Stanislaw,
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc3 next-20161028]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for
convenience) to record
Hi Stanislaw,
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc3 next-20161028]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for
convenience) to record
5 matches
Mail list logo