On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 02:53:50PM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
> >
> > flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> > and
On 08/16, Dan Aloni wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
> >
> > flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> > and release_dev() to use cancel_de
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
>
> flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> and release_dev() to use cancel_delayed_work_sync/cancel_work_sync.
>
>
On 07/01, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:37:49 +0400
> Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
> >
> > flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> > and release_dev()
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:37:49 +0400
Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
>
> flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> and release_dev() to use cancel_delayed_work_sync/cancel_wor
5 matches
Mail list logo