Re: [PATCH 20/25] sparc: Use Kbuild infrastructure to handle asm-generic headers

2012-10-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 17:54 -0400, David Miller wrote: > I really would like to take less rather than take more. > > This whole UAPI, Kbuild, etc. stuff is just bogging subsystem > maintainers down. This kind of stuff should just go via the person > who does all the work and knows how it all tie

Re: [PATCH 20/25] sparc: Use Kbuild infrastructure to handle asm-generic headers

2012-10-13 Thread David Miller
From: Steven Rostedt Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:54:00 -0400 > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 23:19 -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Steven Rostedt >> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:26:52 -0400 >> >> > From: Steven Rostedt >> > >> > Use Kbuild infrastructure to handle the asm-generic headers >> > and remo

Re: [PATCH 20/25] sparc: Use Kbuild infrastructure to handle asm-generic headers

2012-10-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 23:19 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt > Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:26:52 -0400 > > > From: Steven Rostedt > > > > Use Kbuild infrastructure to handle the asm-generic headers > > and remove the wrapper headers that call them. > > > > This only affects head

Re: [PATCH 20/25] sparc: Use Kbuild infrastructure to handle asm-generic headers

2012-10-12 Thread David Miller
From: Steven Rostedt Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:26:52 -0400 > From: Steven Rostedt > > Use Kbuild infrastructure to handle the asm-generic headers > and remove the wrapper headers that call them. > > This only affects headers that do nothing but include the generic > equivalent. It does not tou