Thanks for your comment. Because my colleague Mouli has left for
sabbatical, I will continue work on the X86_64 UEFI support kernel
patch.
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 16:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:06:15 -0700
> Chandramouli Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> You
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:06:15 -0700
Chandramouli Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
You just sent three patches, all with the same name. Please take care to
choose different and good Subject:s for each patch.
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt covers this a bit.
> EFI x8
Chandramouli Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.21rc7-git2-orig/Documentation/dontdiff
> linux-2.6.21rc7-git2-orig/drivers/char/Kconfig
> linux-2.6.21rc7-git2-uefi-finaltest/drivers/char/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.6.21rc7-git2-orig/drivers/char/Kconfig 2007-04-19
> 12:3
Sorry for the late replay I missed this patch series going by the first time.
> +static efi_status_t
> +phys_efi_set_virtual_address_map(unsigned long memory_map_size,
> + unsigned long descriptor_size,
> + u32 descriptor_version,
> +
On 5/3/07, chandramouli narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Can you share EFI code as much as possible among ia64, i386,
> and x86_64 instead of duplicating it?
Hi Randy,
Based on the feedback from Andi and you, these are the areas:
1. conversion of EFI memory map to e820
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 20:59:46 Chandramouli Narayanan wrote:
General note on EFI x86_64 support
--
More review. This code unfortunately has some problems.
First this seems to be quite different from what the 32bit EFI
support does (w
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 20:59:46 Chandramouli Narayanan wrote:
> General note on EFI x86_64 support
> --
More review. This code unfortunately has some problems.
First this seems to be quite different from what the 32bit EFI
support does (which i suppose is pre UEFI
On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:20:30 -0700 chandramouli narayanan wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Can you share EFI code as much as possible among ia64, i386,
> > and x86_64 instead of duplicating it?
> Hi Randy,
>
> Based on the feedback from Andi and you, these are the areas:
>
> 1. conversion of EFI
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Can you share EFI code as much as possible among ia64, i386,
and x86_64 instead of duplicating it?
Hi Randy,
Based on the feedback from Andi and you, these are the areas:
1. conversion of EFI memory map to e820 map
2. Consolidation/sharing of efi code among the architectur
On Tue, 01 May 2007 11:59:46 -0700 Chandramouli Narayanan wrote:
> EFI x86_64 build option is added to the kernel configuration.
Hi Mouli,
Can you share EFI code as much as possible among ia64, i386,
and x86_64 instead of duplicating it?
A diffstat patch summary would be Good.
(see Documentat
10 matches
Mail list logo
