On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:45:56AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> actually, we have a big multiplexer there already, so it's only
> symmetric. Nothing is served by doing it half-assed. I raised the issue
> of the multiplexer back when the first futex API was merged (years ago),
> and it was rejecte
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:45:56AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> include/asm-i386/futex.h:
>
> switch (cmp) {
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ: ret = (oldval == cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE: ret = (oldval != cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:04:53AM +0100, Pierre Peiffer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This latest patch is an adaptation of the sys_futex64 syscall
> > provided in -rt patch (originally written by Ingo). It allows the
> > use of 64bit futex.
>
> Big
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:04:53AM +0100, Pierre Peiffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This latest patch is an adaptation of the sys_futex64 syscall provided in
> -rt
> patch (originally written by Ingo). It allows the use of 64bit futex.
Big NACK here, we don't need yet another goddamn multiplexer. Please
4 matches
Mail list logo
