Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix

2005-08-23 Thread John Hawkes
> + for_each_cpu_mask(i, cur->cpus_allowed) { > + for_each_cpu_mask(j, node_to_cpumask(cpu_to_node(i))) { > + if (!cpu_isset(j, cur->cpus_allowed)) > + return; Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Acked-by: John Hawkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Hawkes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix

2005-08-23 Thread Dinakar Guniguntala
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:04:27AM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > If Dinakar, Hawkes and Nick concur (and no one else complains too > loud) then the following should go into 2.6.13, to avoid the potential > kernel oops that Hawkes reported in Dinakar's feature to allow user > control of dynamic sched

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix

2005-08-23 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /* > + * Hack to avoid 2.6.13 partial node dynamic sched domain bug. > + * Require the 'cpu_exclusive' cpuset to include all (or none) > + * of the CPUs on each node, or return w/o changing sched domains. > + * Remove this hack