Brett Russ wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Brett Russ wrote:
2) Isn't it wrong for the IRQ disable at the chip to occur *after*
free_irq() is called to disconnect the handler (independent of
question 1...since this is the case currently)? Granted, all of the
ports have gone through scsi_remove_host(
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Brett Russ wrote:
2) Isn't it wrong for the IRQ disable at the chip to occur *after*
free_irq() is called to disconnect the handler (independent of
question 1...since this is the case currently)? Granted, all of the
ports have gone through scsi_remove_host() but theoretically
Brett Russ wrote:
Jeff,
This looked prime to cut since ahci_remove_one() was a functionally
identical to ata_pci_remove_one() except for the interrupt disable
(have_msi) bits, which fit nicely into ahci_host_stop(). However,
1) Will it work?
2) Isn't it wrong for the IRQ disable at the chip t
3 matches
Mail list logo
