On 05/10/2016 17:59, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I actually benchmarked the underlying instructions quite a bit on
> Intel. (Not on AMD, but I doubt the results are very different.)
> Writes to CR0.TS are *incredibly* slow, as are device-not-available
> exceptions. Keep in mind that, while there's
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/10/2016 15:57, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:14 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/10/2016 02:34, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Andy Lutomirski
Since commit 58122bf1d856 ("x86/fpu: Default
On 05/10/2016 15:57, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:14 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 05/10/2016 02:34, r...@redhat.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Andy Lutomirski
>>>
>>> Since commit 58122bf1d856 ("x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all
>>> CPUs") in Linux 4.6, eager FPU mode has b
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:14 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 05/10/2016 02:34, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> >
> > From: Andy Lutomirski
> >
> > Since commit 58122bf1d856 ("x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all
> > CPUs") in Linux 4.6, eager FPU mode has been the default on all x86
> > systems, and
On 05/10/2016 02:34, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski
>
> Since commit 58122bf1d856 ("x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all
> CPUs") in Linux 4.6, eager FPU mode has been the default on all x86
> systems, and no one has reported any regressions.
>
> This patch removes the ability t
5 matches
Mail list logo
