On 24/04/13 15:51, James Hogan wrote:
> On 24/04/13 14:26, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On 23 April 2013 17:06, James Hogan wrote:
>>> It's certainly heading in that direction a lot. For this patchset I
>>> could get away with dropping arch/metag/soc/*, and deal with anything
>>> that really requires
On 24/04/13 14:26, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 17:06, James Hogan wrote:
>> On 23/04/13 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 23 April 2013, James Hogan wrote:
>>>
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ core-y+=
arch/metag/boot/dts/
core-y
On 23 April 2013 17:06, James Hogan wrote:
> On 23/04/13 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 23 April 2013, James Hogan wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ core-y+=
>>> arch/metag/boot/dts/
>>> core-y += arch/metag/kerne
Thanks for reviewing Arnd.
On 23/04/13 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 April 2013, James Hogan wrote:
>
>> @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ core-y+=
>> arch/metag/boot/dts/
>> core-y += arch/metag/kernel/
>> core-y
On Tuesday 23 April 2013, James Hogan wrote:
> @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ core-y +=
> arch/metag/boot/dts/
> core-y += arch/metag/kernel/
> core-y += arch/metag/mm/
>
> +# SoCs
> +socdir-$(
5 matches
Mail list logo