On 3/7/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:23AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
> - list_add(&cs->sibling, &cs->parent->children);
> + cont->cpuset = cs;
> + cs->container = cont;
> number_of_cpuset
On 3/7/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:23AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /*
> @@ -913,12 +537,14 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset
> int migrate;
> int fudge;
> int retval;
> + struct container *cont;
This seem
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:23AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
> - list_add(&cs->sibling, &cs->parent->children);
> + cont->cpuset = cs;
> + cs->container = cont;
> number_of_cpusets++;
> - mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
What's the rul
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:23AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /*
> @@ -913,12 +537,14 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset
> int migrate;
> int fudge;
> int retval;
> + struct container *cont;
This seems to be redundant?
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe fro
On 2/15/07, Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> config CONTAINERS
> - bool "Container support"
> - help
> - This option will let you create and manage process containers,
> - which can be used to aggregate multiple processes, e.g. for
> - the purposes of reso
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Index: container-2.6.20/init/Kconfig
> ===
> --- container-2.6.20.orig/init/Kconfig
> +++ container-2.6.20/init/Kconfig
> @@ -239,17 +239,12 @@ config IKCONFIG_PROC
> through /pr
6 matches
Mail list logo