Re: [PATCH 2/6] Rename __lock_page to lock_page_slow

2005-07-25 Thread Suparna Bhattacharya
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:36:34PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:54:04PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > > > In order to allow for interruptible and asynchronous versions of > > > lock_page in

Re: [PATCH 2/6] Rename __lock_page to lock_page_slow

2005-07-24 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:54:04PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > > In order to allow for interruptible and asynchronous versions of > > lock_page in conjunction with the wait_on_bit changes, we need to > > define low-level

Re: [PATCH 2/6] Rename __lock_page to lock_page_slow

2005-07-24 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:54:04PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > In order to allow for interruptible and asynchronous versions of > lock_page in conjunction with the wait_on_bit changes, we need to > define low-level lock page routines which take an additional > argument, i.e a wait queue en