Re: [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: sanitise CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING

2007-05-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 29 May 2007 16:16:17 +0200 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Ensure that all of the lock dependency tracking code is under > > > CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This

Re: [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: sanitise CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING

2007-05-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Ensure that all of the lock dependency tracking code is under > > CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This allows us to use the held lock tracking code > > for other purposes. > > There's an aw

Re: [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: sanitise CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING

2007-05-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Ensure that all of the lock dependency tracking code is under > CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This allows us to use the held lock tracking code > for other purposes. There's an awfull lot of ifdefs introduced in this patch, I wonder whether